Wednesday - December 21, 2011

real life chucky at the age of two terrorizes school

Good grief ....

Take a look at this.

And then read this. 

Mother’s anger as girl, three, is sent home from nursery looking like this after being beaten black and blue by a two-year-old nicknamed Chucky

Girl was taken to hospital with suspected fracture to her eye socket following attack

‘Out of control’ two-year-old is nicknamed ‘Chucky’ after violent doll from the film Child’s Play
Parents demand nursery expels ‘out-of-control’ girl after she ‘attacks 10 other children’
By KERRY MCQUEENEY

The mother of a little girl who was beaten black and blue by an ‘out-of-control’ two-year-old at nursery has called for the child’s expulsion.

Katie Ann Guttridge, aged three, sustained a bruised eye socket, scratches and three bite marks when she was attacked by her classmate during playtime at Ratby Pre-School Nursery in Leicester.

The little girl’s mother, Clara Mackow, said her daughter was almost blinded in the attack and that her injuries were so bad that she was taken to hospital with a suspected broken eye socket.

Police were called in to investigate the assault but were powerless to act because the girl who attacked Katie is below the legal age of criminal responsibility - which in this country is 10 years old.

When confronted by journalists, the mother of the violent girl refused to discuss her child’s behaviour, saying only: ‘My daughter is two years old. I want nothing more to do with this.’

‘The little girl who attacked her has a history of beating up other children. She’s out of control.

‘I know 10 other children have been assaulted by the girl since September. The staff at the nursery don’t seem able to cope with the difficult children.

‘Ironically, the little girl’s mother is a child minder with close links to the nursery and school so the staff consider her one of their own and seem reluctant to discipline her.

SEE AND READ MORE

Before long we’ll be hearing from the lawyers.
Perhaps a visit from Guido to the mommy dearest of the budding little monster might set things straight.
Might want to send him to the nursery school for a little heart to heart with the school head cos there’s something very wrong here.
If the cops can do nothing, and the school feels defenseless, the only option left is vigilante justice. And I’d vote for that were it my little girl. 

Posted by peiper     on 12/21/2011 at 01:01 PM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Scary Stuff • UK •  
• Comments (8) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

debate over shooting orders in riots and arson.

It’s idiots like this and the ideology they can turn into policy that make me despair.
Actually, kinda pissed me off at the same time.  What a total and complete idiot and isn’t it typical of folks like that, to equate the subject of shooting rioters and arsonists, and extending it to ppl double parking and dropping gum on the streets.  Freekin schmuck. Putz!

This is in reference to the news which isn’t new according to the newspapers, in regard to the police having a shoot to kill okay where life is in jeopardy.

Let’s give the police machine guns. They would feel so much more secure if they could mow down a perp .... or one who looks as if he might be. It would also fulfill a boyhood ambition to get a job where you can shoot people, just like one did on computer games but for real. Also, once we let half crazed young men and menopausal older men (I refer of course to the police) play with real guns we won’t need to bring back capital punishment. Which will save lots of money wasted on court trials. Shooting miscreants dead will certainly be a powerful deterrent against all sorts of caught-in-the-act crimes, including speeding, double parking, dropping chewing gum on the pavement, wearing a hood and so on. It will make the USA with their three-strikes-and-you’re-out policy seem like a bunch of cissies.
- rob alka, London UK, 21/12/2011 10:02

I ask you. Is that stupid er what?

The Daily Mail ran this editorial today.  And the idiot head of a police association agrees.  Shooting ppl just isn’t the English way he said on radio last night.
BTW, The Mail is generally a conservative paper. Well, most of their better columnists are.

Shooting rioters is not the answer

By DAILY MAIL COMMENT

There is no greater supporter of law and order than the Mail. But is it really necessary for senior officers to say that in future riots, police may shoot arsonists who attack commercial properties linked to people’s homes?
Of course, strictly speaking they are merely restating the existing law. All British citizens (including the police) can claim a defence for killing, when it is the only way to save an innocent life.
But this is a deeply disingenuous argument. For by issuing the threat in its official review of riot-control tactics, HM Inspectorate of Constabulary is indulging in provocative – and we would say counter-productive – bravado, unworthy of the British police force’s tradition of restraint.
Goodness knows, the Mail holds no brief for rioters, who deserve the heaviest punishments the law can throw at them.
But in truth, it is almost impossible to imagine circumstances in which shooting an arsonist would be the sole means of saving a life.
On the contrary, in the vast majority of cases – as we’ve seen so often in the U.S. – when the police open fire with real or plastic bullets they only inflame unrest, leading to further loss of life.

DM EDITORIAL

If you want to, you can finish reading the rest at the link. They’re wrong,wrong,wrong PERIOD!  They only ppl who might be inflamed, aside from the hand wringing bed wetters on the left, are the criminals themselves.  What does it matter if a few hundred of them were shot dead by police during a riot? Who’d miss the bastards?

Of course, not all comments agree with the DM or the libtards. For example.

It seems CP of KENT 11.43 and other criminal-friendly posters would prefer to see the world tolerate arsonists etc. and would prefer, instead, to see the world as a “better place” without anti-arsonists and other anti-criminal complainants, like Eric Brown , 7.43? Is it any surprise that criminality is a rapidly growing “business” when they know that certain people would rather punish the complainants than punish the criminals?
- John Smith , Birmingham, England, 21/12/2011 12:12

So not all are idiots. But unfortunately the country is run by them and the left and so the only conclusion one can draw is one of hopelessness that things will improve.

The liberal gun hating left seem to forget and dismiss should they remember, photos like this. That’s because it isn’t in their back yard. That’s cos it isn’t any of them jumping out a window in fear for their life.  Miserable SOBs!

Posted by peiper     on 12/21/2011 at 08:11 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • UK •  
• Comments (10) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Thursday - December 15, 2011

a justice (?) system in the toilet. well hell. no wonder it stinks. and it damn well does.

Ever have your eyes opened for the first time?
But late in life rather then early?

It isn’t that I’ve never been sceptical about the law or the injustice system.  It’s more like I hadn’t discovered just how unjust it can be.  Until late in life.

So I’m up all night reading a book impossible to put down called “The Color of Law.”
There is a line, one among many, that stands out and strikes a chord.

It reads as follows.

The law is just a business, a game we play with other people’s lives and money.

Another line says

Check your conscience at the door each morning or you won’t last long in the law.

Coincidence that I’ve read the book at about the same time as the tilt against justice was made in a court last week, and which was reported on here as well as many other blogs.  You may recall I posted a story about four black muslim slags who beat the heck out of a white girl while calling her racial names.  For those of you who missed the article, although I can’t see how, the judge in the case decided that since the four were drunk for the first time (they claimed), then he would not jail the sluts because as muslimes, they were clearly not used to drinking and so acted contrary to their normal behavior.  So they got a get out of jail card.  Now any white that in anger or not would use the ‘N’ word would definitely find themselves in a cell and fined heavily since words do more harm then a severe kicking and beating. 

Well as the old song went, “The Beat Goes On.” and “Ain’t That a Shame?”

This old man, age 79, was hit with what you see him holding. It was thrown by the vermin shown here on the right.

Of course, it was just all in fun and yoot being yoot. It was done by this piece of worthless shit who had this to say after appearing in court.
“HaHa, Got off with a tag.” In other words, he was spared jail time by the system in place here.

He was part of a gang of feral youths that threw a 40lb paving slab at the old man shown, leaving him writhing on the ground in agony.
Ryan Girdlestone walked free from court with a curfew and an electronic tag after his lawyer convinced magistrates the 18-year-old was full of remorse for the incident that ended with Bernard O’Donnell, 79, with a suspected broken leg.

But that is not how he appeared just minutes later, as Girdlestone boasted on his Facebook page: ‘Jus got out off court wiv a 4 mouths [sic] tag hahahha d**ks!!!’

Last night, his victim, a retired deputy head teacher, said: ‘Clearly he has no care for the damage he has caused. If they are laughing at the consequences then it’s hardly a deterrent.’

source,more

So why should this miserable thug worry about the law?  There’s no teeth to bite the bastard with.

And there’s this insane example of justice not done. Another case of fuck the victim.
Maybe it’s almost well that guns are hard to come by here. I have a feeling that otherwise there’s be running gun battles in the streets with 12 year olds armed to the teeth.  On the other hand, the feral shits already own the streets.  The law abiding should be armed with permission to shoot to kill. 
Here, take a look at this dumbo ruling.

‘Only a tyrant would tag someone on their 21st birthday’: Judge spares man caught with keys to stolen car so he can celebrate his birthday

· Corey Brown, 20, who was caught with the keys to a £30k car, repeatedly failed to turn up for unpaid work
· Recorder David Hall refuses to give him an electronic tag - and instead adds an extra seven hours to his community punishment
· Brown says he saw punishment as a ‘bit of a joke’
By KATHERINE FAULKNER

Corey Brown had been ordered to do 150 hours of community service for his role in the theft of a pensioner’s car, but when he failed to turn up for the work sessions five times he was hauled back into court to be given a curfew and an electronic tag.
But he was spared after complaining that the punishment would ruin his plans for a night out on his 21st birthday.

Turning to Brown– who had sat smirking throughout the hearing at Warwick Crown Court – Recorder Hall then said: ‘If I give you seven more hours [of community service] to do, and you keep out of trouble, is that a fair deal?’
Brown, from Bedworth, Warwickshire, simply nodded, and then walked free from court.

And Brown – who has already been to prison three times – admitted that even he was surprised he had been let off.
He said: ‘I was expecting to get a tag for missing my probation dates. Technically, they should have activated my prison sentence. But the judge told me I’d done well so far. He said he didn’t see the point.
‘Thanks to the judge, I can enjoy a few drinks for my birthday, instead of being stuck in with my gran or in prison.’
When asked why he had not turned up to do his community service, he replied: ‘I don’t know; just didn’t think about it. I didn’t care.
‘I suppose I did see the whole thing as a bit of a joke.’
As he prepared to celebrate his 21st birthday yesterday, Brown added: ‘I’ve been to jail three times and I haven’t learned a thing.

more at the source

Well of course he sees it as a joke.  Because it freekin well is a joke. Not a very funny one either but it proves my constant point.
Nobody will fear laws and punishments with no teeth. No one will have a reason to fear being caught for any kind of crime. There will always be a lawyer ready to play the game. And judges and magistrates with no common sense and less brains then god gave a tennis ball aren’t a big help.

Since liberals have achieved a choke hold on the criminal injustice system world wide, we can all look forward to more of the same.
I’m sure by now you have all been made aware of the killings in Belgium over the last 24 hours. Drew posted the story.  Here was a man, another scum sucking bit of worthless flesh with a record. A violent one.  What was he doing out on the streets?  Oh right.  His human rights.

The papers said he came from a North African immigrant background, also had convictions for drug dealing, handling stolen goods and sex abuse.  An immigrant background?  Does that mean he was born of immigrant parents, or that he was himself an immigrant?  Because here in Britain, there are thousands of criminal immigrants and so far, no way or no will to deport them.

For example:

Rapist asylum seeker who dumped victim on rubbish tip is released after being TWO hours away from deportation
· Alphonse Semo, 54, was allowed by judge to marry girlfriend so can stay in Britain
· Father-of-five was jailed for eight years for rape in 2002
By ROB COOPER

An asylum seeker who raped a woman and dumped her on a rubbish tip when he was ‘finished’ has been freed despite Home Office attempts to deport him.
Alphonse Semo, 54, was jailed for eight years for the rape and at the end of his term was due to be sent back to the Congo.
However two hours before his flight he was given permission to marry his girlfriend and stay in the country.
Now a judge has allowed the father-of-five to be released from an immigration detention centre.

read more here

And btw, for a crime of this sort where there is no doubt about guilt, why was the sentence so small?  A crime like rape deserves the death penalty after first ripping off the rapists parts or burning them off.  Wanna bet this non human bit of shit will be on benefits?

In Italy, a man opened fire on some Senegalese merchants killing two.
He was described as being a Fascist and belonged to a right wing Fascist party.
Not that killing a couple of innocent merchants is justified. Ever. But I keep waiting for the violent backlash against the liberals who have brought us to this state. The guy in Italy was angered by immigration and I suppose (no supposing about it ) he was acting on race based ill will.  But if he had to kill anyone, why not the liberals who are responsible for the situation that led to his anger and hate.

Can’t anyone on the far right with violent intent ever get it right?  There’s loads of lawyers for example, on the left, who specialize in civil rights cases. There are so many legitimate targets to choose from but no.  They always seem to shoot the visible result of liberal policy, instead of the liberal ‘activists’ who are the cause. 

Machine-gun thug killed ‘blameless’ pair in a row over parking

By COLIN FERNANDEZ
An argument over parking led to a ‘completely good and blameless’ businessman and his nephew being machine-gunned to death by a drug dealer.

Khan, who has previous convictions for robbery and possession of crack cocaine with intent to supply, looked ‘furious’ as he drove away. About ten minutes later three Asian men returned and started to damage the van which had blocked the road. One pulled out a gun from a bag and opened fire, killing both Amarjit and Rajinder.

Harjinder Tiwana watched in horror as the gunman aimed the gun at her, before the gang fled with hoods pulled over their faces. In February 2004 she identified Khan as the gunman. She told the court: ‘I will never forget the face of the man who murdered my father.’

Mobile phone evidence revealed that after leaving the scene Khan repeatedly phoned another man, Abu Bakr Mansha Khan – who was later jailed for six years in 2006 for plotting to kill a decorated British soldier, Corporal Mark Byles.

Jurors heard that Abu Bakr Mansha Khan was arrested in September 2003 but released and has not stood trial in relation to this incident. It also emerged that the MAC-10 gun used in the murders had been used in another shooting that year, in Coventry.

Prosecutor Nicholas Hilliard said: ‘Nobody hearing about this case could have been anything other than horrified. Two good, blameless men shot dead in broad daylight with a machine gun. It raises a whole host of issues that people feel strongly about – the availability of firearms,

more to read and see

Seems to me they should worry more about criminals who can’t be deported and the abuse of the human rights industry by civil rights lawyers and a too soft approach to punishment.  When there’s any of that, that means anything.  Firearms are NOT easily available to the law abiding, and those who don’t abide don’t care.  What is it they (officialdumb) don’t understand?  If you read the comment by Brits it’s pretty clear they are tired of all the BS.  But the powers that be just are not listening enough.  They are letting technicalities and loopholes put the law abiding in ever more danger with no hope.

If I’ve bored the readers here with all this, it hasn’t been intentional. I’m just so damn sick of seeing this kind of thing so often, and so often the criminals getting off lightly and laughing their way out of court. And if you think the little bit I have posted here is all of it, you’d think wrong.  These are just a few examples of a justice injustice system that is broken.
And here’s the last bit of proof of that.  This is fuckin sick and it isn’t even the very worst of what I’ve seen over the last 7 years. But it’s damn well bad enough.

Gang of nine who beat autistic teenager so badly she was off school for 10 months escape without ANY punishment
· Sophie Russell, 16, was punched about 20 times in the face
· Four girls and five boys let off and police handed just one of the mob a caution
By EMILY ALLEN

Sophie Russell, 16, was attacked by the teenage yobs who left her seriously injured with a broken nose and shattered face at her school in February. 

The teenager from Market Rasen, Lincolnshire, had to have facial surgery and was forced to take 10 months off school to overcome traumatic panic attacks and rebuild her life. 
Her mother Helen, who owns a heating ventilation company with husband Iain, 45, in Louth, Lincolnshire, has criticised police for not prosecuting the youths, saying ‘there has been no justice.’
Sophie, who has Asperger’s syndrome, said: ‘What I went through was really traumatic and ripped the family to bits. I was just walking to my boyfriend’s house and wasn’t expecting to be attacked.

‘Because they are juveniles they have got away with it. If the main offender does it again she will end up in front of a judge, but why give them a chance to do it again?’

A Lincolnshire Police spokesman said the case was passed to the Youth Offending Team who decided not to press charges but to give a caution for common assault.

read and see more

Gee, if this is a “common assault” I’d sure hate to see what they regard as uncommon.  See the link and read the comments. She’s been patched up and is a pretty girl. But inside the damage will last a lifetime.  And the punks walk away free.  Justice would demand that the very same thing be done to them, as they did to her. 

Posted by peiper     on 12/15/2011 at 11:55 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • UK •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - December 10, 2011

the new religion of human rights rules the day

From time to time when reading comments on line from various newspapers here in the UK, there will always be someone and this is a fact writ in stone, who will say that America has become a laughing stock all over the world.  Sometimes they will say merely in the civilized world, but always the phrase, ‘laughingstock.’ It’s used anytime we make a mistake of some kind, or when something is really seriously out of order.  Or it may be the latest gun crime. 
Of course I think they’re just on the bash the USA bandwagon which is popular in every generation except for the 2nd war. And even then many point a finger of (unfair) accusation that we arrived a bit late in the show.  Others accuse us of overcharging for the second hand equipment supplied before we did get in. They say we led Britain to financial ruin by insisting we get paid for things sent.  Seems like a very Bolshie attitude to me.

So anyway … this is not about lend lease and WW2. My mind just drifted there momentarily.  No.
This is all about being a laughing stock. Which we are not but that doesn’t matter at this moment. The question is … does this story make Britain itself a laughing stock?
Could this story ever appear in an American newspaper? Would the USA be this stupid on our very worst of days?  The correct answer is no to both.  I just can not bring myself to believe we’d ever do this to ourselves.  Of course, I need to be careful in my predictions.  I wasn’t thinking of America’s 5th column on the left when I wrote that line.

Since I started writing this, I’ve had a change of heart and mind.  No. On second thought Britain isn’t a laughing stock, even with this not very funny article.

Talk about times that try.  Try getting your head around this one dear reader.

Home Office told to bring asylum family back to UK – but they may again deport them. (and pay them thousands)

A judge has ordered the Home Office to bring back a family of asylum seekers it removed nearly six years ago – even though they may then be deported a second time.

By Tom Whitehead, Home Affairs Editor

The family of five Sri Lankans were removed in 2006 but the High Court ruled they were unlawfully detained during the process and demanded they be brought back.
The court made the judgment even though it accepted it was uncertain once they had been returned and dealt with appropriately that they would be allowed to stay in the UK.

As well as the cost of returning the family, who are currently living in Germany, the Home Office was also ordered to pay £37,000 in compensation.
One critic last night said it was like something out of Alice in Wonderland.
The case echoes a ruling in 2006 when the High Court said the Home Office must return a family it had already removed because it had not fully dealt with one member’s appeal.

In the latest ruling, Mr Justice Cranston said the Sri Lankan families rights had been violated in the way they had been dealt with.
Manjit Gill QC, representing the family in court, said they were taken from their beds and flown out of the country after being denied access to legal advice.
The QC said the family, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, had their north London home raided at about 2am on January 10, 2006 by immigration and police officers.

A few hours after being detained, they were put on a 7.50am flight to Germany.  The Home Office has now accepted they were unlawfully detained and the court said they must be brought back.
The judge said the violation of the rights of the husband, his mentally-ill wife and their son and two daughters, now aged between 14 and 23, entitled them to return to the UK, if they so wished.

But he added that the issue of whether they are then allowed to stay was not a matter for the court.
The family were flown to Germany because that was the first EU country they arrived in.

Under a policy known as the Dublin Agreement, member states can require the first country of entry of an asylum seeker to deal with their claim.
It is possible that even when the family is brought back to the UK that it will still be decided Germany is the appropriate country to handle the claim for shelter, meaning the family will be sent back there.

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of Migration Watch UK, said: “This is straight out of Alice in Wonderland but at enormous cost to the British taxpayer.
“This family must be detained strictly in accordance with the law and removed again to Germany which had an obligation to deal with the case.”

Lawyers for the family said today the ruling was “a tremendous relief” to the family, and they would be returning to the UK – “which is something they have been longing for for nearly six years”.

Mr Gill said their treatment was all the more outrageous because, had the correct procedures been adopted, it was inevitable that they would have been able to make an application to remain in the country on human rights grounds.

A UK Border Agency spokesman said: “We are disappointed with this decision and will be looking carefully at our next steps.
“We cannot comment on the details of the individual case for legal reasons.”

source

Posted by peiper     on 12/10/2011 at 04:57 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • UK •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - December 07, 2011

girl gang attack white woman, gang a protected group and go free. SEE THE IDIOT REASONING by judge

You will no doubt recall a post from a week ago with regard to a racist rant in public by a white woman.

She should have known better.  White folks do NOT have a right to express publicly what many think.  That white woman is going to spend Christmas in jail for her own protection, as she’s received death threats, and her home address has been posted to Facebook and Twitter. And all not for what she did, but for what she said.

A woman accused of launching a vile racist rant on a tram is to spend Christmas behind bars after she was remanded in custody for her own safety.
Magistrates took the decision to refuse Emma West’s bail application after they heard she had received death threats and that her address had been circulated on social networking sites Facebook and Twitter.
There were outbursts from supporters of Miss West, who shouted ‘treason’ as she was denied bail at Croydon Magistrates’ Court.

‘Woman on a tram’ to spend Christmas behind bars

And the only reason I am bringing up her case now and here again, is because of the action of four filthy Somali niggers who beat hell out of a white woman, calling her white slags, and suggested killing her.  Of course, we are not surprised and expect this sort of thing from this particular group of life forms, as in general they are not capable of the thinking and feelings of a more civilized world.  You can dress a pig up in a tux, call him friend and invite him into your house but .... it will still be a pig. Won’t it?

The young women who are all muslims it is claimed, were drunk. Take a look at the defense these filthy black and brown sluts put up and the fuckin idiot judge who one can only hope becomes the victim (hopefully a close family member as icing on the race cake as well) of some drunk black muslim. We can only hope.
And yeah, I am pissed.  Imagine how the victim must feel.

Here’s a statement from the stupid idiot mof***er judge about the boy friend trying to defend his girlfriend. PLEASE see the video bmews. What’s it look like to you?

he accepted the women may have felt they were the victims of unreasonable force from Mr Moore as he tried to defend his girlfriend, and handed the defendants a suspended sentence.

Everybody is now the victim.

EXCEPT THE VICTIM!

Girl gang who kicked woman in the head while yelling ‘kill the white slag’ freed after judge hears ‘they weren’t used to drinking because they’re Muslims’

· Yobs ripped lump of hair from Rhea Page’s head during High Street attack

· Three sisters and cousin escape with six-month suspended sentences

· Maximum term for assault occasioning actual bodily harm is five years’ jail

· Judge: ‘Those who knock someone to the ground and kick them in the head can expect to go inside, but I’m going to suspend the sentence’

By ANDY DOLAN and KATHERINE FAULKNER

A gang of Muslim women who attacked a passer-by in a city centre walked free from court after a judge heard they were ‘not used to being drunk’ because of their religion.

The group – three sisters and a cousin – allegedly screamed ‘kill the white slag’ as they set upon Rhea Page as she waited for a taxi with her boyfriend.
Miss Page, 22, was left with a bald patch where her hair was pulled out in the attack and was left ‘black and blue’ after suffering a flurry of kicks to the head, back, arms and legs while motionless on the pavement.

Ambaro Maxamed, 24, students Ayan Maxamed, 28, and Hibo Maxamed, 24, and their 28-year-old cousin Ifrah Nur each admitted actual bodily harm, which carries a maximum sentence of five years’ imprisonment.

But Judge Robert Brown gave them suspended jail terms after hearing mitigation that as Muslims, the women were not used to being drunk. The Koran prohibits Muslims from consuming alcohol, although Islamic teachings permit its use for medicinal purposes.

After the sentencing, Ambaro Maxamed wrote on her Twitter account: ‘Happy happy happy!’, ‘I’m so going out’, and ‘Today has been such a great day’.

Yesterday Miss Page, a care worker, called the sentence ‘disgusting’ and said the gang deserved ‘immediate custody’.

free pass for black muslim scum because of who they are. pix and video and more to read.

And here’s a bit of afterthought from one of the gang of sluts.

‘I’m not proud of it, it’s not something I want to talk about. I just want to get on with my life.’

When asked if she wanted to apologise, she replied: ‘What, to the public? I really don’t care.‘

A couple of years ago I posted an article about a fellow who grew tired, frustrated and finally very angry with his black neighbor. At issue was the neighbor blocking his driveway on a number of occasions.  He complained but that got him nowhere.  Well, one day the black bastard parked across the driveway, the white guy couldn’t get out until he got him to come out and move it and losing his temper, referred to his neighbor in terms that accurately described exactly what he was.  Namely, a black bastard.
He was arrested and charged with anti-social behavior and race hate. He was fined a goodly sum although I don’t now recall how much.
I only mention it here as one example of I’m certain many more, where one set of sub-human life forms seem to have the judges and the law on their side.
And I’d apply that equally to white criminal scum as well.

Everybody is now the victim, except the victim. 

Posted by peiper     on 12/07/2011 at 07:50 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • muslims • UK •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - November 21, 2011

foul language in public is not shocking. no. but it’s still offensive.

This is the subject referred to briefly in another post.

There have been times here at BMEWS, when angry at some outrage or so totally frustrated I could not find proper words, that I may have let fly with a word or two.  Sometimes cussing really does act as a valve of sorts.  But still, I know it isn’t the best way to express myself.  The judge may have a valid point however in that it’s so common place now, that nobody is really shocked. But I’d also say that I bet lots of folks who aren’t shocked, still find foul language in public on the offensive side.  Of course, since the acceptance of the ‘F’ word in place of the punch line in jokes on stage in public over the years, what else would one expect?
Even in a major newspaper I recently caught one columnist either quoting or referring to something as, s**t.  Now that did surprise me a lot cos I had not seen that word used in newspaper before.  Not even the less offensive and milder term, crap. Which these days can also be used to describe something as junk, as worthless and even, unbelievable.

Is the world a better place because bad language is an acceptable mode of communication?
Kinda doubt it.

Licence to swear: Profanity is so common that it can’t be offensive, judge rules

By REBECCA CAMBER

Yobs should not be punished for hurling obscenities in public – because swear words are now so common that they no longer cause distress, a High Court judge has ruled.

In a landmark judgment, Mr Justice Bean upheld the appeal of a foul-mouthed thug who was convicted for repeatedly using the f-word while being searched by police.

The ruling paves the way for scores of other louts to challenge their convictions for public order offences – and could force police to pay them compensation for wrongful arrest.

The decision, which provoked outrage among police, comes just weeks after the London Mayor Boris Johnson and Britain’s most senior policeman called for a zero-tolerance crackdown on those who abuse officers.

The case was brought by Denzel Harvey, who was fined £50 at Thames Youth Court for repeatedly swearing at officers while he was being searched for cannabis in 2009. The High Court heard that the 20-year-old launched into a tirade of abuse when he was stopped by two police officers in the street in Hackney, east London, telling them: ‘***k this, man. I ain’t been smoking nothing.’

When no drugs were found following a search, he continued: ‘Told you you wouldn’t find ***k all.’ After being asked whether he had a middle name, the surly yob replied: ‘No – I’ve already ****ing told you so.’

Mr Harvey was arrested for the outburst, and magistrates found him guilty of a public order offence after hearing that the expletives were uttered in a public area while a group of teenage bystanders gathered round.

But the conviction was quashed at the High Court, with Mr Justice Bean saying the ‘rather commonplace’ expletive is heard ‘all too frequently’

He claimed it was ‘quite impossible to infer that the group of young people who were in the vicinity were likely to have experienced alarm or distress at hearing these rather commonplace swear words used’.

Simon Reed, vice chairman of the Police Federation, said yesterday: ‘It’s astounding that you can use every swear word to abuse a police officer and they have got to accept it just because it is common.

‘This gives the green light for everyone to swear and use disorderly behaviour with police.’

The ruling is likely to reignite the row between Mr Johnson and the Justice Secretary, Ken Clarke, over swearing at police. 

Mr Harvey was charged under section five of the Public Order Act 1986, which makes it an offence to ‘use threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby’.

But in June it emerged that officers had been advised not to arrest those who verbally abuse police, with guidance stating that courts ‘do not accept’ that swearing at officers results in ‘harassment, alarm or distress’.

Last month Mr Johnson said he agreed with the new Metropolitan Police commissioner, Bernard Hogan-Howe, that that guidance should be scrapped.

‘Public servants are not there to be abused,’ Mr Johnson said. ‘They are there to serve society and society must respect them.

‘How can a copper cope with the job if the public are allowed to insult them with impunity?’

Mr Johnson wants a new offence of ‘swearing at or abusing a police officer acting in the execution of his or her duty’.

He told the Conservative Party conference: ‘If people swear at the police, they must expect to be arrested.

‘Not just because it’s wrong to expect officers to endure profanities, but also because of the experience of the culprits.

‘If people feel there are no boundaries and no retribution, then I’m afraid they will go on to commit worse crimes.’

your right to cuss in public

Posted by peiper     on 11/21/2011 at 12:40 PM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Judges-Courts-Lawyers •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Sunday - November 20, 2011

idiot judge sides with anarchist activists, says all united in decency. does that tell you something

In a statement read out outside court by protester Oliver Pope, 20, the group said: ‘Today, the ten of us who were on trial have been found guilty of taking part in a protest - a protest that was dubbed ‘sensible’ by the senior police officer at the scene.
‘We were standing up, or more accurately sitting down, against our government making harsh cuts to public services, whilst letting big companies get away with dodging a total of tens of billions of pounds of tax every year.
‘Then we are put on trial, whilst it’s clear the real criminals are the tax dodgers, the politicians and the bankers who caused this financial crisis and who continue to profit.
‘We are supposed to have a democratic right to protest yet people like us, exercising that right and expressing our discontent feel the force of the law and receive harsh and disproportionate sentences.
‘We will, of course, continue to fight this and will be appealing the judgement.’

Well now, lets see how this democratic crowd of high minded anarchists expressed their discontent.

First of all, the so called tax evaders have avoided, legally, they have not evaded their taxes. It’s one thing to insist ppl pay more if you want to insist on that. But these jerks didn’t seem to have a clue that companies they were ranting about, broke no tax laws.
Furthermore, the store these unwashed creeps out for fun and never mind their false claim, invaded and broke up a store that donates part of all their sales to charity. Something these yahoos never learned ahead of time.
They are filth, they all deserved to be put against a wall and shot. Because next time there’s rioting in London and elsewhere, it’ll be the very same crowd doing the same thing.

Now then …. one thing that makes this thing really maddening, is the idiot judge who praised them and called them ‘decent’ protesters. And that has cause quite a stir as you’ll imaging. But hey, with jerk judges like that, it’s like a get out of jail card for the likes of the so called protesters.  Who have proven that generally, they make it up as they go along. The photos tell the story though.

And here’s the idiot judge. Just the very thing to reassure the public. What an ignorant ass. But then, that’s what the law is. Innit?

Outcry as judge praises the ‘decent’ protesters who invaded Fortnum’s

By CHRIS GREENWOOD
A judge provoked anger by praising the ‘common sense of decency’ of a gang of protesters who invaded Fortnum & Mason.
They were among more than 130 people who stormed into the Queen’s grocer after splitting off from a huge TUC march through London.

The activists caused damage and loss of business estimated at more than £100,000 as they terrorised staff and customers.

But District Judge Michael Snow said the protest was ‘ill-judged’ rather than malicious as he handed conditional discharges to ten defendants. He also declined to award Fortnum & Mason any compensation.

He said: ‘Civil disobedience has a long and entirely peaceful history in this country.

History often vindicates those involved in such acts. I’ve read a series of glowing references on behalf of every one of you. You are united by a common sense of decency.’

The ten were convicted of aggravated trespass with intent to intimidate after a six-day trial at Westminster magistrates’ court.
They are the latest protesters involved in disruptive economic and environmental demonstrations to receive lenient treatment from the courts.

Earlier this year activists who tried to shut down a coal-fired power station near Nottingham were spared jail after a judge declared they acted with the ‘highest possible motives’

see the high minded innocent public minded left at work

This country is overpopulated with idiot judges.

Posted by peiper     on 11/20/2011 at 11:30 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • UK •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

society that can’t protect itself while children suffer rape

A few days ago Drew made a comment or two that wasn’t exactly positive in nature,, with regard to the culture and the way things are going these days.
He was referring to another unrelated (to this post’s) topic and was also referring to the USA. But nothing is cheery here either.
I had long ago come to the conclusion that western societies were causing self inflicted wounds, and have been doing so for so long, I see no hope of the patient’s recovery. I hate to be so damn gloom and doomish but when I read things like the following, again and again, I despair.  I really do.
I think we (USA is included) have developed a very corrosive culture.  For example, a few days ago there was a movie review for a film whose name I don’t recall, that warned of the following.
“Graphic scenes of torture and animal cruelty.”

Good grief. Torture? Graphic? Animal cruelty?  Why in heaven’s name is that considered “entertainment?” Anyone who can watch that, even if it is,
“Only a Movie” has a very twisted sense of good and evil, right and wrong. And by the way .... garbage like that is never ‘just a movie.’ It’s a template for a future generation of degenerates who will revel in cruelty to people, when they’re through with the animals. It’s a blueprint for a Mad Max society.

Of course, the producers of movies over the years have been more concerned with being ... “Edgy.” “Pushing the envelope.” I see little difference between a society that enjoys exhibitions of animal cruelty and promotes graphic scenes of torture on film to be watched in theaters, and the roaring crowds filled with blood-lust in the Roman Colosseum. 

Now then ... speaking of self inflicted wounds.  And degenerate. A society that can not or will not protect itself.
If this isn’t an outrage devoid of all common sense .....

Child rapist used ‘human rights’ to fight deportation - then struck again

· Asylum-seeker raped four-year-old girl before heading off to preach as a Jehovah’s witness
· Jailed for ten years for raping a 16-year-old girl a decade ago
By CHRIS GREENWOOD and JACK DOYLE

A convicted sex attacker raped and violently molested two young girls as he fought deportation on human rights grounds.

Asylum-seeker William Danga, 39, subjected the children to appalling abuse before and after he was jailed for raping a teenager.
One was just four years old when the Congolese national forced himself on her before heading out to preach as a Jehovah’s Witness.

Yesterday a judge said it was ‘remarkable’ that the sex attacker was not thrown out of Britain after being jailed for ten years for raping a 16-year-old girl a decade ago.
Officials were ordered to deport Danga at the end of his sentence but he frustrated their efforts after losing his passport.

He was then freed on immigration bail while he challenged the move on the grounds that he had a right to a ‘family life’ because he had children with a young girlfriend.
The case is the latest in a string of outrages in which dangerous foreign criminals have used European laws to continue living here.

Just two months ago Nigerian rapist Akindoyin Akinshipe, 24, escaped deportation after European judges ruled he had a right to a ‘private life’ in Britain.
Like many others, he used Article 8 of the Human Rights Act to claim the right to a ‘family life’.

Home Secretary Theresa May wants to scale back the use of the controversial clause in a bid to wrest back more control over our borders.
Danga was convicted of rape and a string of other sexual offences yesterday after a five-day trial at Croydon Crown Court, and jailed for 15 years.

Danga repeatedly attacked her before church meetings, but she escaped his clutches when he was sent from South East London to live in an immigration hostel in Portsmouth a year later.

It was there that Danga was convicted of violently raping the 16-year-old girl in her bedroom after she tried to end their friendship.

He was convicted of rape and jailed for ten years, with the judge ordering him to be deported on his release.

But in 2006 he was able to return to South East London after serving half his sentence, and began his legal battle to stay in Britain.

He began sexually abusing his first victim again before raping and molesting the second girl, who was just seven.

Unemployed Danga, who has two young children with his girlfriend Carla, whom he met when she was 18, shouted abuse at relatives of the two girls as he was led to the cells.

Last year around 200 foreign criminals won the right to stay in this country using Article 8, the right to a ‘private and family life’.

They included failed asylum seeker Aso Mohammed Ibrahim, who ran over 12-year-old Amy Houston and left her to ‘die like a dog’. He has fathered two children here.

Tory ministers have pledged to replace the Human Rights Act – which enshrines the European Convention on Human Rights into British law – with a UK Bill of Rights, but they have been opposed by their Lib Dem coalition partners.

A UK Border Agency spokesman said: ‘We will seek to remove this individual as soon as he has finished his sentence. In 2010 we deported 5,235 foreign national prisoners from the UK.’

READ AND SEE MORE

Since it’s so very obvious and has been for decades, that jail does NOT deter, why doesn’t child rape carry a death penalty? In time, this low life will be free. If deported, does anyone think he won’t continue?

Posted by peiper     on 11/20/2011 at 09:45 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • UK •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - November 19, 2011

mom dies after fall down shaft, firemen told not to break health and safety rules.

This is my final for the night. Hate to end on this sad note but feel compelled to post this story.
A very sad comment on the world we now inhabit.
Sitting here trying to come up with something but hell, I’ll just let the article speak for itself.
Take a look at this, and be sure to see the link below before the Mail removes the story.

Left to die by the health and safety jobsworths: Mother who fell 45ft down mine shaft wasn’t rescued - because firemen were told life-saving gear would break the rules

Alison Hume left at bottom of collapsed 45ft mine shaft for six hours
She suffered fatal heart attack brought on by hypothermia
Inquiry found fire service evidence ‘bullish, if not arrogant’

Strathclyde Fire and Rescue said her death was a source of ‘enormous regret’ but did not apologise

By JONATHAN BROCKLEBANK

A mother of two who fell 45ft down a mine shaft died after fire chiefs refused to mount an immediate rescue operation because of health and safety fears.

Alison Hume, 44, was left lying in agony in the cold and dark for eight hours with several broken bones.

A report into her death yesterday found she could have survived if rank-and-file firemen had been allowed to do their job and bring her out.

One fireman had been lowered down while a paramedic was strapped up in a harness ready to follow.

But bosses refused to use a winch to lift out the mother-of-two because they were slavishly following rules which said the equipment could only be used to save their own staff.

Instead they waited through the early hours of the morning for a police mountain rescue team to arrive.

Mrs Hume was lifted out but died shortly afterwards from a heart attack brought on by hypothermia.

Last night her stepfather Hugh Cowan, 69, said: ‘They need to ask why people are using health and safety as an excuse for failure, rather than a reason for success.’

The case is the latest example of emergency service personnel putting their safety ahead of those they are supposed to be rescuing. Ten-year-old Jordan Lyon, of Wigan, drowned in a pond in 2007 after two police community support officers said they were unable to help him due to health and safety regulations.

Earlier this year coroner David Roberts said the emergency services must be prepared to ‘risk their lives’ after hearing how red tape cost vital minutes during Derrick Bird’s Cumbrian gun massacre.

Mrs Hume fell down the 45ft mine shaft, part of a coal mine that closed in 1926, at 11.30pm while taking a shortcut home across a field near Galston in Ayrshire after visiting friends in July 2008.

She was found by her teenage daughter before Strathclyde Fire and Rescue Service arrived and fireman Alexander Dunn was lowered to the bottom of the shaft.

Please see this link for the whole story and photos.
lots more here

Posted by peiper     on 11/19/2011 at 04:50 PM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Health and Safety • UK •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - November 18, 2011

NEWS BRIEF

It’s been less then two weeks since I said I was tired of gypsy and traveller stories, and wasn’t going to post anymore on the topic.  Well …. I am reminded of that old expression, never say never cos guess what?
Yeah … that tired old subject is here again with the very same tiresome cast

They’re B A A A A KKK!

Or say they are. Here’s the brief lowdown.

While I was away, Drew posted the story about the eviction of the scum at a place called Dale Farm.  I won’t rehash the story here except to say they were on land illegally and it took sorry ass authorities 10 years to move em, at very high cost in monies.
Some of them said they’d fight their eviction to the death, but none did cos I notice every damn one is still breathing.

Well folks …. here’s a very brief update.

Their caravans are lining up and parked outside the old site where they were tossed from, waiting for the chance to move back in.  Which they say is their plan.

See?  They have proved my point made a year ago and repeated from time to time.
Dead travellers do not return to the scene of their former occupations.

Dead child abusers and rapists do not return to re-offend.  Which is the subject of a later post.  But in a nutshell … guy leaves mental unit unsupervised (after 23 yrs) and kidnaps a 10 year old boy within ten minutes of his release.
Old story with new cast member. The shrinks are so easily fooled.

WHY IS THIS GUY STILL BREATHING?

Posted by peiper     on 11/18/2011 at 10:50 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • News-Briefs •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - November 16, 2011

Three Wives? Two Husbands? Move To Canada, Quick!

This is a very quick follow up to Peiper’s post below on the ‘honor killings’ in Canada. And a HUGE indication of cultural decline.

January 4, 2011

A court hearing challenging Canada’s anti-polygamy law on religious freedom grounds resumes Wednesday in British Columbia and will eventually include testimony from men and women who are living in multiple-partner marriages.

The hearing will not immediately change the status quo, as British Columbia Supreme Court Chief Justice Robert Bauman’s ruling will not bind any courts.

But his ruling will address questions about whether polygamy is a criminal activity under Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and, if it is illegal, under what circumstances. Observers predict that if Justice Bauman’s ruling is appealed, the issue could end up before the Supreme Court of Canada, which could make a binding ruling about polygamy.

The legal hearing revolves around the British Columbia community of Bountiful. Formed in 1946, its 400 or so members belong to a breakaway Mormon sect that permits men to have multiple wives.

The challengers of Canada’s anti-polygamy law say that the nation’s 1982 Charter of Rights and Freedoms gives people the right to practice “plural marriage.”

For believers in the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, “celestial marriage” — i.e., plural marriage — “is an essential FLDS religious principle,” and “unless the faithful participate in it, they cannot enter into the fullness of glory in the kingdom of heaven in the afterlife,” William John Walsh, an expert on FLDS, said in an affidavit to the court.

The FLDS long ago split from the mainstream Mormon Church, which formerly practiced polygamy but ceased the practice in 1890 and condemns the FLDS as heretical.

People who practice Islam, Wicca and other religions also are adversely affected by the anti-polygamy law, Vancouver lawyers George K. Macintosh, Ludmila B. Herbst and Tim Dickson said in a brief to the court.

November 8, 2011

Landmark polygamy ruling expected in two weeks

VANCOUVER — The British Columbia Supreme Court is expected to release its long-awaited ruling in a polygamy case on Nov. 23. In April, after 42 days of hearing evidence about whether or not Canada’s polygamy law is constitutional, Chief Justice Robert Bauman reserved judgment. Bauman’s ruling will be posted on the B.C. Supreme Court website, according to information released by court officials Tuesday.

A lockup for reporters is being organized just prior to the release of the ruling.

Lawyers for the governments of Canada and B.C. called witnesses to testify to the harm caused by polygamy. They argued that the practice puts women and children at sufficient risk to justify limiting religious freedoms.

A lawyer appointed by the court marshalled the groups that say the law is over-broad and unconstitutional and should be struck down. Those groups included the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and the B.C. Civil Liberties Association.

Wiki data:

Canada: It is illegal by Section 293 of the Criminal Code of Canada. Bigamy is banned by Section 290. However, the law banning polygamy is not enforced by the government. As of January 2009, no person has been prosecuted in over sixty years. A reference case is currently under way in the Supreme Court of British Columbia challenging the constitutionality of this law.

November 6, 2011: An opinion

There isn’t a shred of evidence that polygamy benefits women. Even the UN, often a laughingstock of blind ideologues, has declared that polygamy violates women’s equality rights. Still, that hasn’t stopped academics (who should know better) from suggesting that polygamy be decriminalized.

The latest educator to jump on the decriminalization bandwagon is U of A poli-sci professor Lois Harder. In a recent study written for the Vanier Institute of the Family, Harder wonders if women in polygamous families might be better off if polygamy wasn’t a crime.

“Decriminalizing polygamy would not entail expanding the definition of marriage to include polygamous marriages,” she wrote. “Rather, it would provide a firmer foundation from which to protect women and children in polygamous relationships from exploitation.”

Yeah, right. Remove polygamy from the Criminal Code and all those young girls and women who’ve been brainwashed by the men in Bountiful, B.C., and other polygamous communities will shake off the shackles of exploitation and go to university to become doctors, lawyers and, oh, poli-sci profs.
...
It’s incredibly naive to believe that polygamy can exist without the exploitation of women. The females in these dysfunctional relationships may not think they’re being taken advantage of. They may, in fact, insist they freely chose such a lifestyle.

After all, what woman wouldn’t want to get married in her mid-teens to someone old enough to be her father or grandfather, drop out of school, have a baby every year and share her husband with a bunch of sister-wives? Isn’t that every woman’s dream?
...
Polygamy is simply incompatible with equality and basic human dignity. It’s soul-destroying and merely feeds the deranged dictates of pathological egotists.

Mohammad Shafia’s house rules

At the Shafias’, court hears, men were the law, women property and teen behavior worthy of execution

On paper, Mohammad Shafia was the ideal immigrant, a wealthy, self-made businessman eager to inject his dollars into the Canadian economy. An Afghan who made his fortune in Dubai real estate, Shafia wasted little time setting up shop in his adopted country. In 2008, a year after arriving in Montreal, he purchased a $2-million strip mall in Laval—with a cash down payment of $1.6 million. He launched a company that imported and distributed clothing, household goods and construction material. And he chose the posh suburb of Brossard to build a sprawling mansion with plenty of room for all 10 members of his polygamous clan: himself, two wives and seven children.

The new house was still under construction on June 30, 2009, when three of the Shafia girls—Zainab, 19, Sahar, 17, and Geeti, 13—were discovered at the bottom of the Rideau Canal, floating inside a sunken black Nissan that also contained the lifeless body of their “stepmother,” Shafia’s first wife, Rona Amir Mohammad. The four passengers appeared, at first glance, to be the victims of a late-night joyride gone horribly wrong. Within weeks, however, detectives in Kingston, Ont., offered a far more chilling version of events, laying first-degree-murder charges against a trio of suspects: Mohammad Shafia, the dead girls’ father; Tooba Yahya, their mother; and Hamed Shafia, their brother.

Today, more than two years later, the Shafia patriarch sleeps in a tiny cell with his eldest son. His wife—the one that’s still breathing—is locked in a separate prison.

Much much more at this link.

Canada long ago fell off the left edge of the earth as far as I’m concerned, and has become a socialist cesspool. I would be amazed if the Canadian Supreme Court upheld the existing law, and I’d be even more amazed if they demanded that it actually be enforced. Selective enforcement of laws is one of the ways that a socialist tyranny hides behind a facade of democracy - just ask Obama and Holder. I fully expect the crazy Canucks to rule that polygamy is perfectly fine and dandy. And that any animal over 40lbs is capable of unspoken consent to a human sexual interaction.

The West is going straight to hell.

Posted by Drew458     on 11/16/2011 at 08:21 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Religion • RoPMA •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - November 15, 2011

victim stabbed 56 times and killer let out to attend event after two years. law and disorder

So ya think injustice rules in the USA with regard to the Criminal Justice System?
Ha.  Take a look at this bit of lunatic asylum thinking on the part of authorities here.

If you take the time to read the comments after the article at the link, you will see more evidence of how little public opinion and desire are thought of. And this isn’t new. It’s only the latest in a long line of outrages. And yet many here (on the left of course) still go on and on about the large number of citizens who are “incarcerated” in the USA.  Ignoring that many are not citizens at all. Still though ... this really does beat all.
Is it now okay to say, Only in England?  But then, that wouldn’t be entirely true either. Would it?

I will never, ever understand this kind of thing.

Tough justice? Killer who stabbed love rival 56 times is let out for wedding and a half marathon just two and a half years after being jailed

Karla Biddle, 34, jailed for seven years in 2009 after she killed her ex-fiancé’s new girlfriend
Friend of victim’s family: ‘They are struggling to cope as it is. To see pictures of her enjoying herself so soon after being sentenced for a brutal crime is devastating’

By RICK DEWSBURY
Last updated at 5:23 PM on 15th November 2011

A killer who stabbed her love rival 56 times was at the centre of a prison investigation today after being photographed at a wedding and running a half-marathon.

Karla Biddle, now 34, was jailed for seven years in 2009 after she knifed her ex-fiancé’s new girlfriend Emma Bradshaw in a frenzied attack the previous year.

The family of Miss Bradshaw condemned the sentence earlier this month when it emerged that Biddle is due to be released from prison this week after serving just two years and eight months inside.

But the latest pictures are sure to pile fresh hurt on the grieving family.

They show a smiling Biddle posing in a pink party dress at a wedding in Co Sligo, Ireland, this September. The killer looks on as other guests enjoy a chocolate fountain.

Biddle has also been photographed grinning while running the Birmingham half marathon and joining a Race For Life charity run.

The prison service is now investigating whether Biddle, from Yardley, Birmingham, breached her licence by attending a wedding in the Irish Republic.

Prisoners are not normally given permission to travel overseas while on licence.

If she has been found to have breached the conditions of her licence she would be sent back to prison to continue serving her sentence.

After seeing photos of the killer at the wedding and running events a Prison Service spokesman said: ‘We do not comment on individual prisoners, but if prisoners breach their licence in any way, they will be subject to disciplinary proceedings and are likely to be moved to closed conditions.’

The victim’s devastated family said they were ‘disgusted’ by the photos.

more here with photos and comments from readers

Posted by peiper     on 11/15/2011 at 12:53 PM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • UK •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - November 12, 2011

political pygmies running the show in UK, bow as always to EU human rights laws

This is so far beyond moronic I can’t find the words.
Whatever happened to something called logic?  Common sense and survival of self and community?
How can you run a country if you insist on following the letter of a law written in another country by people who were not elected by the voters and taxpayers in your country?  Answer that one please.

I can not believe, in spite of what what I read here, that the UK can’t simply tell the ECOHR that some rules are just plain daft and unworkable. And unreasonable.
For damn certain unreasonable.

Look at this one.  Insane!

Dancing at his own wedding ‘paralysed’ Moroccan who claimed £400,000 in benefits… and can’t be kicked out because of human rights

By COLIN FERNANDEZ

An illegal immigrant who claimed to be paralysed from the neck down but was filmed dancing at his wedding cheated more than £400,000 in benefits, a court heard yesterday.

But even though Mohamed Bouzalim, 37, has admitted dishonestly entering the country and fraudulently exploiting the welfare system, legal sources said they will face an ‘uphill battle’ to deport him.

There is a strong likelihood the Moroccan will be able to remain in the UK by claiming he has a right to family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, immigration sources said.

When Bouzalim came to Britain in June 2001, he had no papers and claimed to be an Afghan national whose father had been executed by the Taliban, Isleworth Crown Court in west London was told.

Using the name Mohamed Amir Hussini, he successfully claimed asylum before constructing the extraordinary lie that he was paralysed and required 24-hour care, receiving £66,000 a year in benefits.

His total haul of around £400,000 was from Camden Council, the Department for Work and Pensions and the Independent Living Fund, the court heard.

The fraud ended when UK Border Agency staff raided his home in Kilburn, north London, last year.

In it, they found a video of Bouzalim performing energetic dance moves at his own wedding the previous year – miraculously without his wheelchair.

Bouzalim, who has been in custody for 18 months, has pleaded guilty to 11 charges of dishonesty. His brothers Rachid, 35, and Abdallah, 39, and sister Zahra, are all on bail having also admitted fraud charges.

Yesterday, the Moroccan appeared in court sitting in a wheelchair, wearing glasses, a red shirt, grey tracksuit bottoms and black plimsolls. He had wild Afro-style hair and a straggly beard.

Accompanied by two nurses, he appeared to struggle to raise his arm and speak when asked if he was present by the court clerk. However Judge Simon Oliver cast doubt on defence claims he was unwell, referring to a psychiatric report from the medium-secure unit in Southall, west London, where he is being held.

see photo and read more

In the best interests of fairness to all, and just to see how handicapped he is, if he is.  There are inventive ways to find out.
I mean, aside from the photo at the link showing him dancing.

The politicians complying with outside dumb laws that are abused every day here, are political pygmies with no backbone.

Posted by peiper     on 11/12/2011 at 01:13 PM   
Filed Under: • Border Security • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • EUro-peons • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Outrageous • UK •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

what if straights decided to have a pride in straight parade

It won’t happen of course, and if it ever did - the straights taking part in such a parade would be tagged as ‘homophobic.’

Are these somewhat queer folk so insecure and maybe even questioning of their own position (no puns) that they need parades and their own flag to prove their worth?  And not content with shouting (and showing) their predilection for all the world to hear, next year they are adding another day to the event.
Now it’s going to be a global day. Watch for a special holiday in the future where banks and POs are closed and stores announce large money saving sales to celebrate queerdom.

Lets not be too quick to blame them however.  It couldn’t be done minus the help in every form, financial - organizational etc. without huge support from the left.
None of the bs, pc, acceptance could thrive as it has, without the conservative majority (who are the honest liberals) just laying down and going with the program dictated by the left.

I don’t have a personal problem with their private lives.  I don’t care what they do behind closed doors and I don’t hate or fear them. 
What I object to strongly are major corps. such as this one also laying down and appeasing a group who are such a minority of any given population. I don’t even believe the left, although strong enough to alter habits and attitudes, is anywhere near the majority they hold sway over.  And they do. 

What a world.

Outrage as Tesco backs gay queer festival… but drops support for cancer charity event

Tesco’s contribution would be used to run an entertainment area for families and children at next year’s festival.

By SEAN POULTER

Tesco has triggered outrage by ending its support for the Cancer Research ‘Race for Life’ while deciding to sponsor Britain’s largest gay festival.

Some religious commentators and groups have condemned the decision and are calling for a boycott of the supermarket chain.

Tesco has worked with Cancer Research for more than ten years, raising hundreds of millions of pounds to help combat an illness that will affect one in three of the population.

The chain’s main contribution was support for the annual fundraising Race for Life, the UK’s largest women-only charity event, which has raised more than £400million for the fight against cancer since it began in 1994.

But shortly after Tesco announced the partnership would end, the firm said it would be a headline sponsor of Pride London.

This is Britain’s largest gay pride event, and will be adding a second day next year when it hosts the global WorldPride 2012 festival in July.

Tesco’s chief executive of retailing services, Andrew Higginson, said: ‘Our “Out at Tesco” team will be working closely with Pride London to ensure next year’s event is even more fun.’

Francis Phillips, a commentator at The Catholic Herald, condemned the shift, saying: ‘Tesco is a supermarket.

Its remit has been to sell good-quality food and other items at very reasonable prices, and in this it has been hugely successful.

Why has it now aligned itself with an aggressive political organisation such as Pride London?

‘Why has it given up its sponsorship of Cancer Research? Or at least…why hasn’t it taken up with another mainstream charity such as the British Legion or Age UK?

‘There are thousands of ex-servicemen and wounded soldiers needing help in this country, and millions of elderly people in danger of neglect.
‘They are a fundamental part of the fabric of our society – the kind of fabric that Tesco should be reflecting.’

David Skinner of the Anglican Mainstream organisation, which supports traditional marriage and family life, has written to complain to Mr Higginson and Tesco chief executive Philip Clarke.

He wrote: ‘For Tesco to sponsor a tiny homosexual minority – according to the Office for National Statistics, that amounts to little more than 1 per cent of the population – will be showing the utmost contempt for a large proportion of British society that still adheres, more or less, to the morality and values of the Ten Commandments.’

read and see more

PS: America.  You have a Tesco branch in a manner of speaking.  It’s a convenience outlet new to the USA in the last few years.
It’s called Fresh & Easy, doesn’t have cashiers (the one in Palm Desert doesn’t anyway) and is all self serve.  Tesco is the parent company.

Posted by peiper     on 11/12/2011 at 03:54 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Gay Gay Gay! • Politically Correct B.S. •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner